Skip to index

Flux vs Recraft

Flux and Recraft are both Image Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, editorial scores, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeFluxRecraft
Product statusStatus not recordedStatus not recorded
VendorBlack Forest LabsRecraft
Rating★ 4.7★ 4.6
PricingFreemiumFreemium
PlatformsWeb, API, LocalWeb, API
Key featuresText-to-image models, Task-specific editing variants, Selected downloadable weightsSVG generation, Raster image generation, Image editing and vectorization
Headquarters——
Launched——
Open sourceNoNo

Key differences

  • Flux carries the higher editorial score (4.7★ vs 4.6★).
  • Both Flux and Recraft use a Freemium model.
  • Flux runs on Web, API, Local; Recraft runs on Web, API.

Flux and Recraft at a glance

Flux

Black Forest Labs

Black Forest Labs image-model family with selected downloadable weights and hosted endpoints; model licenses and commercial-use conditions differ.

Rating
4.7★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

Consider FLUX when you need model-level integration or local deployment; select a checkpoint and establish its license and total cost before committing.

Strengths

  • Downloadable weights for selected models
  • Official inference code and model cards
  • Separate models for generation and editing

Key features

  • Text-to-image models
  • Task-specific editing variants
  • Selected downloadable weights
  • Official inference repository
  • Model-specific licensing

Best for

  • Text-to-image concept drafts
  • Local model evaluation under the relevant license
  • Editing with task-specific FLUX.1 variants
Read the full Flux review →

Recraft

Recraft

Raster and SVG image platform with editing, vectorization and reusable styles; free-plan outputs are public and not commercially licensed.

Rating
4.6★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

A candidate for editable vector drafts. Check the plan's commercial rights and inspect the exported file before delivery.

Strengths

  • Documented SVG output for continued editing
  • Raster generation, vectorization and image editing options
  • API workflow with reusable styles

Key features

  • SVG generation
  • Raster image generation
  • Image editing and vectorization
  • Reusable styles
  • Separately billed API Units

Best for

  • SVG icon and illustration drafts for further editing
  • Exploring visual styles before a brand review
  • Evaluating raster/vector generation in a developer workflow
Read the full Recraft review →

Feature overlap

  • The two tools have no listed features in common — see both feature lists above.
  • Flux also lists: Text-to-image models, Task-specific editing variants, Selected downloadable weights, Official inference repository, Model-specific licensing
  • Recraft also lists: SVG generation, Raster image generation, Image editing and vectorization, Reusable styles, Separately billed API Units

Frequently asked questions

Is Flux or Recraft better?

By editorial score, Flux scores higher (4.7★ vs 4.6★). Both are capable Image Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.

Which is cheaper, Flux or Recraft?

Both Flux and Recraft use a Freemium pricing model.

Are Flux and Recraft open source?

No — neither Flux nor Recraft is open source.

What platforms do Flux and Recraft support?

Flux supports Web, API, Local; Recraft supports Web, API.

What are the main features of Flux and Recraft?

Flux: Text-to-image models, Task-specific editing variants, Selected downloadable weights, Official inference repository, Model-specific licensing. Recraft: SVG generation, Raster image generation, Image editing and vectorization, Reusable styles, Separately billed API Units.

Visit Flux →Visit Recraft →

More Image Generation comparisons

AUTOMATIC1111 vs ComfyUIAUTOMATIC1111 vs Draw ThingsAUTOMATIC1111 vs FluxAUTOMATIC1111 vs FooocusAUTOMATIC1111 vs InvokeAUTOMATIC1111 vs Kittl