Skip to index

Veo vs Wan 2.1

Veo and Wan 2.1 are both Video Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, editorial scores, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeVeoWan 2.1
Product statusStatus not recordedStatus not recorded
VendorGoogle DeepMindAlibaba
Rating★ 4.6★ 4.5
PricingPay-as-you-goFree
PlatformsWeb, APISelf-hosted, Model weights, ComfyUI
Key featuresModel-dependent video and native audio generation, Image and frame guidance, Selected models support video extensionText-to-video checkpoints, Separate image and first/last-frame models, 1.3B/14B task-dependent choices
Headquarters——
Launched——
Open sourceNoYes

Key differences

  • Veo carries the higher editorial score (4.6★ vs 4.5★).
  • Veo is Pay-as-you-go, while Wan 2.1 is Free.
  • Wan 2.1 is open source (its code is public), while Veo is proprietary.
  • Veo runs on Web, API; Wan 2.1 runs on Self-hosted, Model weights, ComfyUI.

Veo and Wan 2.1 at a glance

Veo

Google DeepMind

Google DeepMind's video model family, available through selected Google apps and APIs; model versions and access routes have different features and billing.

Rating
4.6★
Pricing
Pay-as-you-go

Editorial verdict

Match the exact version, access route and rights requirements first. Budget API generation separately and review output before publication.

Strengths

  • Published model-specific controls and metering
  • Audio and visual generation in supported versions

Key features

  • Model-dependent video and native audio generation
  • Image and frame guidance
  • Selected models support video extension
  • API usage billed separately from consumer plans

Best for

  • Storyboard or visual drafts using authorized references
  • Evaluate a specific frame-control or extension workflow
Read the full Veo review →

Wan 2.1

Alibaba

The downloadable Wan2.1 video-model release, with separate text, image and first/last-frame checkpoints under Apache-2.0; hardware and content rights still require review.

Rating
4.5★
Pricing
Free

Editorial verdict

Consider Wan2.1 when you can operate the exact checkpoint and review generated footage, rights and resource use.

Strengths

  • Published task-specific checkpoints
  • Self-managed video workflow options

Key features

  • Text-to-video checkpoints
  • Separate image and first/last-frame models
  • 1.3B/14B task-dependent choices
  • Optional local or API prompt expansion

Best for

  • Reviewed text/image video drafts
  • Experiments with a specifically licensed checkpoint
Read the full Wan 2.1 review →

Feature overlap

  • The two tools have no listed features in common — see both feature lists above.
  • Veo also lists: Model-dependent video and native audio generation, Image and frame guidance, Selected models support video extension, API usage billed separately from consumer plans
  • Wan 2.1 also lists: Text-to-video checkpoints, Separate image and first/last-frame models, 1.3B/14B task-dependent choices, Optional local or API prompt expansion

Frequently asked questions

Is Veo or Wan 2.1 better?

By editorial score, Veo scores higher (4.6★ vs 4.5★). Both are capable Video Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.

Which is cheaper, Veo or Wan 2.1?

Veo is Pay-as-you-go and Wan 2.1 is Free. Check each product page for current plan details.

Are Veo and Wan 2.1 open source?

Wan 2.1 is open source, while Veo is proprietary.

What platforms do Veo and Wan 2.1 support?

Veo supports Web, API; Wan 2.1 supports Self-hosted, Model weights, ComfyUI.

What are the main features of Veo and Wan 2.1?

Veo: Model-dependent video and native audio generation, Image and frame guidance, Selected models support video extension, API usage billed separately from consumer plans. Wan 2.1: Text-to-video checkpoints, Separate image and first/last-frame models, 1.3B/14B task-dependent choices, Optional local or API prompt expansion.

More Video Generation comparisons