Cody vs Cursor
Cody and Cursor are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cody | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Sourcegraph | Cursor |
| Rating | ★ 4.2 | ★ 4.8 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Platforms | Desktop, Web | Desktop |
| Key features | Codebase-wide context, Multi-repository search, Inline edits and chat | AI code generation, Code explanation, Smart completion |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, USA | San Francisco, USA |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Open source | No | No |
Key differences
- Cursor has a higher user rating (4.8★ vs 4.2★).
- Both Cody and Cursor use a Freemium model.
- Cody runs on Desktop, Web; Cursor runs on Desktop.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cody or Cursor better?
By user rating, Cursor scores higher (4.8★ vs 4.2★). Both are capable Code Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Cody or Cursor?
Both Cody and Cursor use a Freemium pricing model.
Are Cody and Cursor open source?
No — neither Cody nor Cursor is open source.