Skip to index

ComfyUI vs Invoke

ComfyUI and Invoke are both Image Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, editorial scores, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeComfyUIInvoke
Product statusStatus not recordedActive
VendorComfy OrgInvoke
Rating★ 4.7★ 4.6
PricingFreemiumFree
PlatformsWindows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud, APIDesktop, Self-host
Key featuresNode-based workflow composition, JSON graph save/load, Model and custom-node configurationLayered canvas with in/outpainting, Node-based workflows, Checkpoint and LoRA management
Headquarters——
Launched——
Open sourceYesYes

Key differences

  • ComfyUI carries the higher editorial score (4.7★ vs 4.6★).
  • ComfyUI is Freemium, while Invoke is Free.
  • Both ComfyUI and Invoke are open source.
  • ComfyUI runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud, API; Invoke runs on Desktop, Self-host.

ComfyUI and Invoke at a glance

ComfyUI

Comfy Org

Node-based media workflows with JSON graph exchange and custom extensions; local open-source software, paid cloud execution and external model calls have separate requirements and costs.

Rating
4.7★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

Consider it when you need editable node workflows and can maintain their components. Confirm model permissions and local, cloud and external-call costs before production.

Strengths

  • Node-based composition and JSON workflow exchange
  • Local code available under GPL-3.0
  • Custom nodes and optional hosted/API workflows

Key features

  • Node-based workflow composition
  • JSON graph save/load
  • Model and custom-node configuration
  • Local software with optional paid cloud/Partner Nodes

Best for

  • Designing a versioned image or video workflow
  • Sharing a graph together with documented dependencies
  • Evaluating local versus hosted execution costs
Read the full ComfyUI review →

Invoke

Invoke

A self-hosted image application with a layered canvas, node workflows and model management; the former vendor cloud has closed.

Rating
4.6★
Pricing
Free

Editorial verdict

Evaluate the community self-hosted application; do not buy on the assumption that its former cloud still operates.

Strengths

  • Canvas and reproducible workflows documented
  • Local deployment and model management

Key features

  • Layered canvas with in/outpainting
  • Node-based workflows
  • Checkpoint and LoRA management
  • Self-hosted browser interface

Best for

  • Reviewed layered image editing
  • Reusable self-hosted generation workflows
Read the full Invoke review →

Feature overlap

  • The two tools have no listed features in common — see both feature lists above.
  • ComfyUI also lists: Node-based workflow composition, JSON graph save/load, Model and custom-node configuration, Local software with optional paid cloud/Partner Nodes
  • Invoke also lists: Layered canvas with in/outpainting, Node-based workflows, Checkpoint and LoRA management, Self-hosted browser interface

Frequently asked questions

Is ComfyUI or Invoke better?

By editorial score, ComfyUI scores higher (4.7★ vs 4.6★). Both are capable Image Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.

Which is cheaper, ComfyUI or Invoke?

ComfyUI is Freemium and Invoke is Free. Check each product page for current plan details.

Are ComfyUI and Invoke open source?

Yes — both ComfyUI and Invoke are open source.

What platforms do ComfyUI and Invoke support?

ComfyUI supports Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud, API; Invoke supports Desktop, Self-host.

What are the main features of ComfyUI and Invoke?

ComfyUI: Node-based workflow composition, JSON graph save/load, Model and custom-node configuration, Local software with optional paid cloud/Partner Nodes. Invoke: Layered canvas with in/outpainting, Node-based workflows, Checkpoint and LoRA management, Self-hosted browser interface.

More Image Generation comparisons