Skip to index

ComfyUI vs Recraft

ComfyUI and Recraft are both Image Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, editorial scores, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeComfyUIRecraft
Product statusStatus not recordedStatus not recorded
VendorComfy OrgRecraft
Rating★ 4.7★ 4.6
PricingFreemiumFreemium
PlatformsWindows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud, APIWeb, API
Key featuresNode-based workflow composition, JSON graph save/load, Model and custom-node configurationSVG generation, Raster image generation, Image editing and vectorization
Headquarters——
Launched——
Open sourceYesNo

Key differences

  • ComfyUI carries the higher editorial score (4.7★ vs 4.6★).
  • Both ComfyUI and Recraft use a Freemium model.
  • ComfyUI is open source (its code is public), while Recraft is proprietary.
  • ComfyUI runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud, API; Recraft runs on Web, API.

ComfyUI and Recraft at a glance

ComfyUI

Comfy Org

Node-based media workflows with JSON graph exchange and custom extensions; local open-source software, paid cloud execution and external model calls have separate requirements and costs.

Rating
4.7★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

Consider it when you need editable node workflows and can maintain their components. Confirm model permissions and local, cloud and external-call costs before production.

Strengths

  • Node-based composition and JSON workflow exchange
  • Local code available under GPL-3.0
  • Custom nodes and optional hosted/API workflows

Key features

  • Node-based workflow composition
  • JSON graph save/load
  • Model and custom-node configuration
  • Local software with optional paid cloud/Partner Nodes

Best for

  • Designing a versioned image or video workflow
  • Sharing a graph together with documented dependencies
  • Evaluating local versus hosted execution costs
Read the full ComfyUI review →

Recraft

Recraft

Raster and SVG image platform with editing, vectorization and reusable styles; free-plan outputs are public and not commercially licensed.

Rating
4.6★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

A candidate for editable vector drafts. Check the plan's commercial rights and inspect the exported file before delivery.

Strengths

  • Documented SVG output for continued editing
  • Raster generation, vectorization and image editing options
  • API workflow with reusable styles

Key features

  • SVG generation
  • Raster image generation
  • Image editing and vectorization
  • Reusable styles
  • Separately billed API Units

Best for

  • SVG icon and illustration drafts for further editing
  • Exploring visual styles before a brand review
  • Evaluating raster/vector generation in a developer workflow
Read the full Recraft review →

Feature overlap

  • The two tools have no listed features in common — see both feature lists above.
  • ComfyUI also lists: Node-based workflow composition, JSON graph save/load, Model and custom-node configuration, Local software with optional paid cloud/Partner Nodes
  • Recraft also lists: SVG generation, Raster image generation, Image editing and vectorization, Reusable styles, Separately billed API Units

Frequently asked questions

Is ComfyUI or Recraft better?

By editorial score, ComfyUI scores higher (4.7★ vs 4.6★). Both are capable Image Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.

Which is cheaper, ComfyUI or Recraft?

Both ComfyUI and Recraft use a Freemium pricing model.

Are ComfyUI and Recraft open source?

ComfyUI is open source, while Recraft is proprietary.

What platforms do ComfyUI and Recraft support?

ComfyUI supports Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud, API; Recraft supports Web, API.

What are the main features of ComfyUI and Recraft?

ComfyUI: Node-based workflow composition, JSON graph save/load, Model and custom-node configuration, Local software with optional paid cloud/Partner Nodes. Recraft: SVG generation, Raster image generation, Image editing and vectorization, Reusable styles, Separately billed API Units.

More Image Generation comparisons