Cursor 2.0 vs Zed
Cursor 2.0 and Zed are both Code Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Cursor 2.0 | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | Zed Industries |
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.6 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Platforms | Desktop | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Key features | Multi-agent parallel runs, Side-by-side diff review, Composer mode | Rust-native performance, Agentic editing panel, Inline AI transformations |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Boulder, USA |
| Founded | 2025 | 2021 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Key differences
- Cursor 2.0 and Zed share the same user rating (4.6★).
- Cursor 2.0 is Paid, while Zed is Freemium.
- Zed is open source (its code is public), while Cursor 2.0 is proprietary.
- Cursor 2.0 runs on Desktop; Zed runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor 2.0 or Zed better?
Cursor 2.0 and Zed are rated equally (4.6★) by users, so the better choice depends on your needs — see the feature and platform comparison above.
Which is cheaper, Cursor 2.0 or Zed?
Cursor 2.0 is Paid and Zed is Freemium. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Cursor 2.0 and Zed open source?
Zed is open source, while Cursor 2.0 is proprietary.