Filmora vs Wan
Filmora and Wan are both Video Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, user ratings, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Attribute | Filmora | Wan |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Wondershare | Alibaba |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.5 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Platforms | Desktop, Windows, macOS | Self-hosted, API, Web |
| Key features | Desktop timeline editor, AI captions, effects and audio tools, Heavy effect and title pack | Open weights (5B & 14B tiers), Text-to-video & image-to-video, First/last frame control |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen, China | Hangzhou, China |
| Founded | 2015 | 2025 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Key differences
- Wan has a higher user rating (4.5★ vs 4.4★).
- Filmora is Paid, while Wan is Free.
- Wan is open source (its code is public), while Filmora is proprietary.
- Filmora runs on Desktop, Windows, macOS; Wan runs on Self-hosted, API, Web.
Frequently asked questions
Is Filmora or Wan better?
By user rating, Wan scores higher (4.5★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Video Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.
Which is cheaper, Filmora or Wan?
Filmora is Paid and Wan is Free. Check each product page for current plan details.
Are Filmora and Wan open source?
Wan is open source, while Filmora is proprietary.