Skip to index

Filmora vs Wan

Filmora and Wan are both Video Generation tools in our directory. This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, editorial scores, supported platforms, key features and open-source status so you can decide which one fits your needs.

Side-by-side comparison

AttributeFilmoraWan
Product statusStatus not recordedStatus not recorded
VendorWondershareAlibaba
Rating★ 4.4★ 4.5
PricingFreemiumPay-as-you-go
PlatformsWindows, macOSSelf-hosted, API, Web
Key featuresTimeline and media editing, Caption and audio tools, Model-dependent AI generationPublic Wan2.2 code and weights, Checkpoint-specific text/image-to-video, Model-specific GPU requirements
Headquarters——
Launched——
Open sourceNoYes

Key differences

  • Wan carries the higher editorial score (4.5★ vs 4.4★).
  • Filmora is Freemium, while Wan is Pay-as-you-go.
  • Wan is open source (its code is public), while Filmora is proprietary.
  • Filmora runs on Windows, macOS; Wan runs on Self-hosted, API, Web.

Filmora and Wan at a glance

Filmora

Wondershare

A desktop video editor for arranging media, effects and captions, with separately metered AI features and asset licensing conditions.

Rating
4.4★
Pricing
Freemium

Editorial verdict

Choose the operating system, version and asset rights before buying. Budget AI credits and asset renewals separately from the editor.

Strengths

  • Documented desktop editing controls
  • Separate credit and asset rules are published

Key features

  • Timeline and media editing
  • Caption and audio tools
  • Model-dependent AI generation
  • Version, credit and asset entitlements

Best for

  • Reviewed edits of authorized footage
  • Captioned tutorials and explainers
Read the full Filmora review →

Wan

Alibaba

Alibaba's video model family: public Wan2.2 code/weights for self-hosting and separately billed cloud models. Capabilities, hardware, licenses and fees must be checked per release and service.

Rating
4.5★
Pricing
Pay-as-you-go

Editorial verdict

Select a specific Wan checkpoint or cloud model first, then budget hardware or usage fees and validate its outputs; the family name alone does not establish quality, licensing or cost.

Strengths

  • Public Wan2.2 code and checkpoints enable self-hosting
  • Model-specific local inference instructions
  • Separate cloud API option with documented usage billing

Key features

  • Public Wan2.2 code and weights
  • Checkpoint-specific text/image-to-video
  • Model-specific GPU requirements
  • Separately billed cloud API

Best for

  • Evaluating a versioned local video-generation pipeline
  • Comparing self-hosted and cloud deployment budgets
  • Research with a specifically licensed Wan2.2 checkpoint
Read the full Wan review →

Feature overlap

  • The two tools have no listed features in common — see both feature lists above.
  • Filmora also lists: Timeline and media editing, Caption and audio tools, Model-dependent AI generation, Version, credit and asset entitlements
  • Wan also lists: Public Wan2.2 code and weights, Checkpoint-specific text/image-to-video, Model-specific GPU requirements, Separately billed cloud API

Frequently asked questions

Is Filmora or Wan better?

By editorial score, Wan scores higher (4.5★ vs 4.4★). Both are capable Video Generation tools, so review the feature comparison for your use case.

Which is cheaper, Filmora or Wan?

Filmora is Freemium and Wan is Pay-as-you-go. Check each product page for current plan details.

Are Filmora and Wan open source?

Wan is open source, while Filmora is proprietary.

What platforms do Filmora and Wan support?

Filmora supports Windows, macOS; Wan supports Self-hosted, API, Web.

What are the main features of Filmora and Wan?

Filmora: Timeline and media editing, Caption and audio tools, Model-dependent AI generation, Version, credit and asset entitlements. Wan: Public Wan2.2 code and weights, Checkpoint-specific text/image-to-video, Model-specific GPU requirements, Separately billed cloud API.

More Video Generation comparisons